<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
>

<channel>
	<title>OutloudOpinion &#187; health care reform</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outloudopinion.com/tag/health-care-reform/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outloudopinion.com</link>
	<description>Podcasts for Thinkers.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 09:45:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<!-- podcast_generator="Blubrry PowerPress/1.0.8" mode="advanced" entry="simple" -->
	<itunes:summary>Podcasts for Thinkers.</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:author>OutloudOpinion</itunes:author>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://www.outloudopinion.com/wp-content/plugins/powerpress/itunes_default.jpg" />
	<itunes:owner>
		<itunes:name>OutloudOpinion</itunes:name>
		<itunes:email>webmaster@outloudopinion.com</itunes:email>
	</itunes:owner>
	<managingEditor>webmaster@outloudopinion.com (OutloudOpinion)</managingEditor>
	<itunes:subtitle>Podcasts for Thinkers.</itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:keywords>Conservative podcast, Immigration, Foreign Affairs, Iran, Israel, Iraq, Environmentalism, Global Warming, Global Warming Hoax, conservative, republican</itunes:keywords>
	
	<itunes:category text="News &amp; Politics" />
		<item>
		<title>Obamacare, Two Years Later    3.21.12</title>
		<link>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2012/03/21/obamacare-two-years-later-3-21-12/</link>
		<comments>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2012/03/21/obamacare-two-years-later-3-21-12/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 18:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Tanner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[National Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[affordable care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal budget deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monumental failure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">52672E33-9146-4493-8EA1-8EBBD6414883</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week marks two years since of the passage of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, and if the Obama administration has chosen to all but ignore the second anniversary of Obamacare, the rest of us should pause and&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week marks two years since of the passage of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, and if the Obama administration has chosen to all but ignore the second anniversary of Obamacare, the rest of us should pause and reflect on just what a monumental failure of policy the health-care-reform law has been.</p>
<p>What’s more, it has been a failure on its own terms. After all, when health-care reform was passed, we were promised that it would do three things: 1) provide health-insurance coverage for all Americans; 2) reduce insurance costs for individuals, businesses, and government; and 3) increase the quality of health care and the value received for each dollar of health-care spending. At the same time, the president and the law’s supporters in Congress promised that the legislation would not increase the federal-budget deficit or unduly burden the economy. And it would do all these things while letting those of us who were happy with our current health insurance keep it unchanged. Two years in, we can see that none of these things is true.</p>
<p>Brought to you by OutloudOpinion.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2012/03/21/obamacare-two-years-later-3-21-12/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://traffic.libsyn.com/nro/20120321Tanner.mp3" length="3151313" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>affordable care,federal budget deficit,health care reform,health care spending,health insurance coverage,monumental failure</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:subtitle>This week marks two years since of the passage of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, and if the Obama administration has chosen to all but ignore the second anniversary of Obamacare, the rest of us should pause and reflect on just what a m...</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>This week marks two years since of the passage of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, and if the Obama administration has chosen to all but ignore the second anniversary of Obamacare, the rest of us should pause and reflect on just what a monumental failure of policy the health-care-reform law has been.

What’s more, it has been a failure on its own terms. After all, when health-care reform was passed, we were promised that it would do three things: 1) provide health-insurance coverage for all Americans; 2) reduce insurance costs for individuals, businesses, and government; and 3) increase the quality of health care and the value received for each dollar of health-care spending. At the same time, the president and the law’s supporters in Congress promised that the legislation would not increase the federal-budget deficit or unduly burden the economy. And it would do all these things while letting those of us who were happy with our current health insurance keep it unchanged. Two years in, we can see that none of these things is true.



Brought to you by OutloudOpinion.com</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Michael Tanner</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Doctorcare Learning the lessons of health-care reform    3.21.12</title>
		<link>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2012/03/21/doctorcare-learning-the-lessons-of-health-care-reform-3-21-12/</link>
		<comments>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2012/03/21/doctorcare-learning-the-lessons-of-health-care-reform-3-21-12/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 18:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc Siegel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[National Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bacon cheeseburger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dying breed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private practitioner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequelae]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">77AAF4FC-D5FA-4D14-8DC7-A876B399DB81</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have finally figured out how to apply the lessons of Obamacare to save my own sinking medical office from bankruptcy.
Under the president’s health-care law, the stated goal of which is to provide easy-to-use health insurance for everyone, you&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have finally figured out how to apply the lessons of Obamacare to save my own sinking medical office from bankruptcy.</p>
<p>Under the president’s health-care law, the stated goal of which is to provide easy-to-use health insurance for everyone, you — the struggling-to-make-ends-meet patient — will see your skyrocketing mandated premiums used to pay not only for contraception, but also for the medical sequelae of a rude and obese McDonald’s customer who chooses to eat one bacon cheeseburger with fries after another. As your physician, I will be paid less and less for treating you even as insurance companies charge you more and more to cover the self-destructive among us. At the same time, Obamacare mandates will shrink your co-pays to the point where I will no longer be able to afford coffee for my nurses.</p>
<p>Don’t get me wrong. I don’t mean to appear selfish or unappreciative of your choosing my services; in fact, I am committed to taking care of you regardless of whether doing so still pays my bills. I will keep my office door open as long as I can afford to keep the lights on. As a private practitioner, I am a dying breed, and even as most of my contemporaries join the ranks of hospitals and clinics, I am pledged to continue to provide you with the kind of care you are used to receiving.</p>
<p>Brought to you by OutloudOpinion.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2012/03/21/doctorcare-learning-the-lessons-of-health-care-reform-3-21-12/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://traffic.libsyn.com/nro/20120321Seigel.mp3" length="3151313" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>bacon cheeseburger,dying breed,health care law,health care reform,private practitioner,sequelae</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:subtitle>I have finally figured out how to apply the lessons of Obamacare to save my own sinking medical office from bankruptcy.  Under the president’s health-care law, the stated goal of which is to provide easy-to-use health insurance for everyone,</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>I have finally figured out how to apply the lessons of Obamacare to save my own sinking medical office from bankruptcy.

Under the president’s health-care law, the stated goal of which is to provide easy-to-use health insurance for everyone, you — the struggling-to-make-ends-meet patient — will see your skyrocketing mandated premiums used to pay not only for contraception, but also for the medical sequelae of a rude and obese McDonald’s customer who chooses to eat one bacon cheeseburger with fries after another. As your physician, I will be paid less and less for treating you even as insurance companies charge you more and more to cover the self-destructive among us. At the same time, Obamacare mandates will shrink your co-pays to the point where I will no longer be able to afford coffee for my nurses.

Don’t get me wrong. I don’t mean to appear selfish or unappreciative of your choosing my services; in fact, I am committed to taking care of you regardless of whether doing so still pays my bills. I will keep my office door open as long as I can afford to keep the lights on. As a private practitioner, I am a dying breed, and even as most of my contemporaries join the ranks of hospitals and clinics, I am pledged to continue to provide you with the kind of care you are used to receiving.



Brought to you by OutloudOpinion.com</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Marc Siegel</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>$1.76 Trillion ObamaCare Cost Doubles Down On Failure  3.14.12</title>
		<link>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2012/03/15/1-76-trillion-obamacare-cost-doubles-down-on-failure-3-14-12/</link>
		<comments>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2012/03/15/1-76-trillion-obamacare-cost-doubles-down-on-failure-3-14-12/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 15:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Investor&#39;s Business Daily</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IBD Editorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bernie Madoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congressional budget office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance premiums]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">426F9FC2-8DD3-472A-869A-36BC57CFBC9E</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Medical Reform: We had to pass it to find what was in it, we were told. As the lies and consequences of health care reform become known, the Congressional Budget Office reveals its true cost — another lie all unto&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Medical Reform: We had to pass it to find what was in it, we were told. As the lies and consequences of health care reform become known, the Congressional Budget Office reveals its true cost — another lie all unto itself.</p>
<p>ObamaCare was sold in part as a way to rein in health care costs, including insurance premiums, and as a big step toward reducing the deficit. Using an accounting gimmick that would make even a Bernie Madoff blush, 10 years of taxes were counted against six years of &#8220;benefits&#8221; to produce huge projected savings.</p>
<p>As we noted at the time, the 2014 date for benefits to start flowing was deliberately chosen to mask the full costs and delay the impact until after the 2012 elections. Had the full impact of ObamaCare been added to the administration&#8217;s war on business and energy, the economy might well have collapsed, and we suspect the White House knew that.</p>
<p>The strategy of hide and delay may have collapsed with a new Congressional Budget Office report that reveals that the current 10-year cost of ObamaCare is an astounding $1.76 trillion. That&#8217;s nearly double the $900 billion President Obama told a special session of Congress on Sept. 9, 2009, that ObamaCare would cost. He also claimed the &#8220;plan will not add to our deficit.&#8221;</p>
<p>by OutloudOpinion.com For more Podcasts visit www.outloudopinion.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2012/03/15/1-76-trillion-obamacare-cost-doubles-down-on-failure-3-14-12/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://media.blubrry.com/ibdeditorials/traffic.libsyn.com/ibdeditorials/604400.mp3" length="2763326" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>Bernie Madoff,congressional budget office,health care costs,health care reform,insurance premiums,medical reform</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:subtitle>Medical Reform: We had to pass it to find what was in it, we were told. As the lies and consequences of health care reform become known, the Congressional Budget Office reveals its true cost — another lie all unto itself.</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Medical Reform: We had to pass it to find what was in it, we were told. As the lies and consequences of health care reform become known, the Congressional Budget Office reveals its true cost — another lie all unto itself.

ObamaCare was sold in part as a way to rein in health care costs, including insurance premiums, and as a big step toward reducing the deficit. Using an accounting gimmick that would make even a Bernie Madoff blush, 10 years of taxes were counted against six years of &quot;benefits&quot; to produce huge projected savings.

As we noted at the time, the 2014 date for benefits to start flowing was deliberately chosen to mask the full costs and delay the impact until after the 2012 elections. Had the full impact of ObamaCare been added to the administration&#039;s war on business and energy, the economy might well have collapsed, and we suspect the White House knew that.

The strategy of hide and delay may have collapsed with a new Congressional Budget Office report that reveals that the current 10-year cost of ObamaCare is an astounding $1.76 trillion. That&#039;s nearly double the $900 billion President Obama told a special session of Congress on Sept. 9, 2009, that ObamaCare would cost. He also claimed the &quot;plan will not add to our deficit.&quot;

by OutloudOpinion.com For more Podcasts visit www.outloudopinion.com</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Investor&#039;s Business Daily</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>3 Ways to Take Birth Control Out of the Presidential Race   02.22.12</title>
		<link>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2012/02/24/3-ways-to-take-birth-control-out-of-the-presidential-race-02-22-12/</link>
		<comments>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2012/02/24/3-ways-to-take-birth-control-out-of-the-presidential-race-02-22-12/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 19:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Gillespie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reason.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[core business focus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presidential election season]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[syndicated columnists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[washington post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">4EFB6BD9-6401-4AFE-9B04-71CCFC6C8F6B</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the heat of a presidential election season, The Washington Post disingenuously asks, &#8220;Birth control as election issue. Why?&#8221;
The title is disingenuous (methinks) because it&#8217;s clear that the main reason why we are talking about this is the rightly&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the heat of a presidential election season, The Washington Post disingenuously asks, &#8220;Birth control as election issue. Why?&#8221;</p>
<p>The title is disingenuous (methinks) because it&#8217;s clear that the main reason why we are talking about this is the rightly controversial mandate in President Obama&#8217;s health care reform plan that virtually all employers, including those for whom contraception is religiously proscribed or not a core business focus, give their employees free-to-them contraceptives.</p>
<p>From OutloudOpinion &#8211; For Podcasts of IBDeditorials, The New Republic, and Over 30 Syndicated Columnists, go to www.outloudopinion.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2012/02/24/3-ways-to-take-birth-control-out-of-the-presidential-race-02-22-12/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://media.blubrry.com/reason/traffic.libsyn.com/reason/3-ways-to-take-birth-control-out-of-the.mp3" length="2763326" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>core business focus,election issue,health care reform,presidential election season,syndicated columnists,washington post</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:subtitle>In the heat of a presidential election season, The Washington Post disingenuously asks, &quot;Birth control as election issue. Why?&quot;  The title is disingenuous (methinks) because it&#039;s clear that the main reason why we are talking about this is the rightly c...</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>In the heat of a presidential election season, The Washington Post disingenuously asks, &quot;Birth control as election issue. Why?&quot;

The title is disingenuous (methinks) because it&#039;s clear that the main reason why we are talking about this is the rightly controversial mandate in President Obama&#039;s health care reform plan that virtually all employers, including those for whom contraception is religiously proscribed or not a core business focus, give their employees free-to-them contraceptives.

From OutloudOpinion - For Podcasts of IBDeditorials, The New Republic, and Over 30 Syndicated Columnists, go to www.outloudopinion.com</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Nick Gillespie</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unions Get Waivers Bought With Political Cash   1.10.12</title>
		<link>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2012/01/11/unions-get-waivers-bought-with-political-cash-1-10-12/</link>
		<comments>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2012/01/11/unions-get-waivers-bought-with-political-cash-1-10-12/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 13:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Investor&#39;s Business Daily</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IBD Editorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaign contributions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lousy service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lucky recipients]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">12EFAF42-6ABD-431A-A5D7-14C5D9513F83</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Politics: In a telltale Friday-night document dump, the White House released records showing the latest lucky recipients of Obama-Care cost waivers. By the wildest of coincidences, 87% of them belong to Big Labor unions.
Interesting, since Big Labor pulled out&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Politics: In a telltale Friday-night document dump, the White House released records showing the latest lucky recipients of Obama-Care cost waivers. By the wildest of coincidences, 87% of them belong to Big Labor unions.</p>
<p>Interesting, since Big Labor pulled out all the stops to get the president&#8217;s signature on health care reform passed in March 2010. But as the waivers came, it&#8217;s clear they never had any expectation of paying for it.</p>
<p>From the very start they carved out special exemptions for themselves, showing all the earmarks of political favors in exchange for campaign contributions. The actual skyrocketing costs, reduced choices and lousy service were shoved on the rest of us.</p>
<p>by OutloudOpinion.com For more Podcasts visit www.outloudopinion.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2012/01/11/unions-get-waivers-bought-with-political-cash-1-10-12/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://media.blubrry.com/ibdeditorials/traffic.libsyn.com/ibdeditorials/597373.mp3" length="2763326" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>campaign contributions,Earmarks,health care reform,labor unions,lousy service,lucky recipients</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:subtitle>Politics: In a telltale Friday-night document dump, the White House released records showing the latest lucky recipients of Obama-Care cost waivers. By the wildest of coincidences, 87% of them belong to Big Labor unions.  Interesting,</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Politics: In a telltale Friday-night document dump, the White House released records showing the latest lucky recipients of Obama-Care cost waivers. By the wildest of coincidences, 87% of them belong to Big Labor unions.

Interesting, since Big Labor pulled out all the stops to get the president&#039;s signature on health care reform passed in March 2010. But as the waivers came, it&#039;s clear they never had any expectation of paying for it.

From the very start they carved out special exemptions for themselves, showing all the earmarks of political favors in exchange for campaign contributions. The actual skyrocketing costs, reduced choices and lousy service were shoved on the rest of us.

by OutloudOpinion.com For more Podcasts visit www.outloudopinion.com</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Investor&#039;s Business Daily</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Romneycare and Obamacare:  A distinction without a difference  1.10.12</title>
		<link>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2012/01/10/romneycare-and-obamacare-a-distinction-without-a-difference-1-10-12/</link>
		<comments>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2012/01/10/romneycare-and-obamacare-a-distinction-without-a-difference-1-10-12/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 15:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rick Santorum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[National Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[massachusetts governor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mitt romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national health care system]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">6F194B9B-1B54-4BB4-98F3-D71B110E2253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the past year, Mitt Romney has been trying to distance himself from his record on health care, most notably from his signature health-care-reform law in Massachusetts, commonly referred to as “Romneycare.”
Although the former Massachusetts governor would prefer to&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the past year, Mitt Romney has been trying to distance himself from his record on health care, most notably from his signature health-care-reform law in Massachusetts, commonly referred to as “Romneycare.”</p>
<p>Although the former Massachusetts governor would prefer to deny it, Romneycare shares many characteristics with Obamacare, the president’s unpopular overhaul of the national health-care system, and over the past five years, Romneycare has proven to have many of the same fatal design flaws that Obamacare has.</p>
<p>Brought to you by OutloudOpinion.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2012/01/10/romneycare-and-obamacare-a-distinction-without-a-difference-1-10-12/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://traffic.libsyn.com/nro/20120110Santorum.mp3" length="3151313" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>health care reform,health care system,massachusetts governor,mitt romney,national health care,national health care system</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:subtitle>For the past year, Mitt Romney has been trying to distance himself from his record on health care, most notably from his signature health-care-reform law in Massachusetts, commonly referred to as “Romneycare.</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>For the past year, Mitt Romney has been trying to distance himself from his record on health care, most notably from his signature health-care-reform law in Massachusetts, commonly referred to as “Romneycare.”

Although the former Massachusetts governor would prefer to deny it, Romneycare shares many characteristics with Obamacare, the president’s unpopular overhaul of the national health-care system, and over the past five years, Romneycare has proven to have many of the same fatal design flaws that Obamacare has.


Brought to you by OutloudOpinion.com</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Rick Santorum</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Obamacare Stopping Businesses From Hiring?   12.22.11</title>
		<link>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2011/12/25/is-obamacare-stopping-businesses-from-hiring-12-22-11/</link>
		<comments>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2011/12/25/is-obamacare-stopping-businesses-from-hiring-12-22-11/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Dec 2011 04:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Stossel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reason.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Republic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[successful businessmen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[syndicated columnists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">A5BFB7FB-67F8-4C88-89A3-88285C44D2C8</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President Obama says his health care “reform” will be good for business.
Business has learned the truth.
Three successful businessmen came on my Fox Business show last week to explain how Obamacare is a reason that unemployment stays high. Its&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Obama says his health care “reform” will be good for business.</p>
<p>Business has learned the truth.</p>
<p>Three successful businessmen came on my Fox Business show last week to explain how Obamacare is a reason that unemployment stays high. Its length and complexity make businessmen wary of expanding.</p>
<p>From OutloudOpinion &#8211; For Podcasts of IBDeditorials, The New Republic, and Over 30 Syndicated Columnists, go to www.outloudopinion.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2011/12/25/is-obamacare-stopping-businesses-from-hiring-12-22-11/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://media.blubrry.com/reason/traffic.libsyn.com/reason/is-obamacare-stopping-businesses-from-hi.mp3" length="2763326" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>business show,health care reform,New Republic,Obama,successful businessmen,syndicated columnists</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:subtitle>President Obama says his health care “reform” will be good for business.  Business has learned the truth.  Three successful businessmen came on my Fox Business show last week to explain how Obamacare is a reason that unemployment stays high.</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>President Obama says his health care “reform” will be good for business.

Business has learned the truth.

Three successful businessmen came on my Fox Business show last week to explain how Obamacare is a reason that unemployment stays high. Its length and complexity make businessmen wary of expanding.

From OutloudOpinion - For Podcasts of IBDeditorials, The New Republic, and Over 30 Syndicated Columnists, go to www.outloudopinion.com</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>John Stossel</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>From Aspiration to Stagnation:  America has underlying problems that no one’s jobs plan will fix. 10.18.11</title>
		<link>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2011/10/18/from-aspiration-to-stagnation-america-has-underlying-problems-that-no-one%e2%80%99s-jobs-plan-will-fix-10-18-11/</link>
		<comments>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2011/10/18/from-aspiration-to-stagnation-america-has-underlying-problems-that-no-one%e2%80%99s-jobs-plan-will-fix-10-18-11/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 15:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Streeter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[National Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class syllabus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journal editors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mba class]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wall street journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">32D1A08A-B3F0-4F37-8820-35B5A0287CB7</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Troubled economic times breed jobs plans. In good times, no one puts forward comprehensive proposals to invigorate the economy. But we live in bad times, so we have lots of plans: Herman Cain’s fun-sounding 9-9-9 plan, Romney’s 59-point MBA-class-syllabus plan,&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Troubled economic times breed jobs plans. In good times, no one puts forward comprehensive proposals to invigorate the economy. But we live in bad times, so we have lots of plans: Herman Cain’s fun-sounding 9-9-9 plan, Romney’s 59-point MBA-class-syllabus plan, the Huntsman‒Wall Street Journal editors plan, President Obama’s “Pass This Newest Stimulus Bill!” plan, and other plans from pundits, congressional candidates, and more — all indicators of a stressed economy.</p>
<p>What if we could wave a wand and immediately enact the best elements of the best plans? Would America bounce back? At one level, the answer is undoubtedly “yes.” Growth-oriented tax rates, entitlement reform, regulatory relief, and real health-care reform would lead to increased investment and new jobs. At another level, though, the answer is “maybe not.”</p>
<p>Brought to you by OutloudOpinion.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2011/10/18/from-aspiration-to-stagnation-america-has-underlying-problems-that-no-one%e2%80%99s-jobs-plan-will-fix-10-18-11/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://traffic.libsyn.com/nro/20111018Streeter.mp3" length="3151313" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>class syllabus,health care reform,journal editors,mba class,real health care,wall street journal</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:subtitle>Troubled economic times breed jobs plans. In good times, no one puts forward comprehensive proposals to invigorate the economy. But we live in bad times, so we have lots of plans: Herman Cain’s fun-sounding 9-9-9 plan,</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Troubled economic times breed jobs plans. In good times, no one puts forward comprehensive proposals to invigorate the economy. But we live in bad times, so we have lots of plans: Herman Cain’s fun-sounding 9-9-9 plan, Romney’s 59-point MBA-class-syllabus plan, the Huntsman‒Wall Street Journal editors plan, President Obama’s “Pass This Newest Stimulus Bill!” plan, and other plans from pundits, congressional candidates, and more — all indicators of a stressed economy.

What if we could wave a wand and immediately enact the best elements of the best plans? Would America bounce back? At one level, the answer is undoubtedly “yes.” Growth-oriented tax rates, entitlement reform, regulatory relief, and real health-care reform would lead to increased investment and new jobs. At another level, though, the answer is “maybe not.”


Brought to you by OutloudOpinion.com</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Ryan Streeter</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Next Time, Try Real Reform   8.2.11</title>
		<link>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2011/08/03/next-time-try-real-reform-8-2-11/</link>
		<comments>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2011/08/03/next-time-try-real-reform-8-2-11/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 11:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Investor&#39;s Business Daily</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IBD Editorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[affordable care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[centers for medicare and medicaid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[centers for medicare and medicaid services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical care system]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">FC546578-EBC8-46A9-AC9B-323DF61A22C2</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Health Care: Wasn&#8217;t the spending curve supposed to bend down? Isn&#8217;t that what we were promised when the president and his party set out to maul our medical care system. So why will spending double by 2020?
Congress needed to&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Health Care: Wasn&#8217;t the spending curve supposed to bend down? Isn&#8217;t that what we were promised when the president and his party set out to maul our medical care system. So why will spending double by 2020?</p>
<p>Congress needed to pass the Democrats&#8217; health care &#8220;reform&#8221; because the law would bend the cost curve downward, Obama frequently said while campaigning for the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.</p>
<p>But the president&#8217;s promise won&#8217;t translate into reality.</p>
<p>According to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, under ObamaCare, health care spending will grow by 5.8% a year through 2020. That&#8217;s 1.1 percentage points faster than it would grow if Washington had done nothing.</p>
<p>This means that our health care spending will grow from 17.6% of the economy in 2009 to 19.8% in 2020, when total expenditures will be more than $4 trillion.</p>
<p>So what did Obama know and when did he know it about the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act? It&#8217;s hard to believe he wasn&#8217;t aware from the beginning that the law would increase costs. If he didn&#8217;t know it, then he&#8217;s not intellectually fit to be president. If he did know that costs would increase, yet continued to say the legislation would cut costs, he&#8217;s morally unfit for the office he occupies.</p>
<p>by OutloudOpinion.com For more Podcasts visit www.outloudopinion.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2011/08/03/next-time-try-real-reform-8-2-11/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://media.blubrry.com/ibdeditorials/traffic.libsyn.com/ibdeditorials/580301.mp3" length="2763326" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>affordable care,centers for medicare and medicaid,centers for medicare and medicaid services,health care reform,health care spending,medical care system</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:subtitle>Health Care: Wasn&#039;t the spending curve supposed to bend down? Isn&#039;t that what we were promised when the president and his party set out to maul our medical care system. So why will spending double by 2020?  Congress needed to pass the Democrats&#039; health...</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Health Care: Wasn&#039;t the spending curve supposed to bend down? Isn&#039;t that what we were promised when the president and his party set out to maul our medical care system. So why will spending double by 2020?

Congress needed to pass the Democrats&#039; health care &quot;reform&quot; because the law would bend the cost curve downward, Obama frequently said while campaigning for the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

But the president&#039;s promise won&#039;t translate into reality.

According to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, under ObamaCare, health care spending will grow by 5.8% a year through 2020. That&#039;s 1.1 percentage points faster than it would grow if Washington had done nothing.

This means that our health care spending will grow from 17.6% of the economy in 2009 to 19.8% in 2020, when total expenditures will be more than $4 trillion.

So what did Obama know and when did he know it about the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act? It&#039;s hard to believe he wasn&#039;t aware from the beginning that the law would increase costs. If he didn&#039;t know it, then he&#039;s not intellectually fit to be president. If he did know that costs would increase, yet continued to say the legislation would cut costs, he&#039;s morally unfit for the office he occupies.

by OutloudOpinion.com For more Podcasts visit www.outloudopinion.com</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Investor&#039;s Business Daily</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Massachusetts Mess    7.18.11</title>
		<link>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2011/07/19/massachusetts-mess-7-18-11/</link>
		<comments>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2011/07/19/massachusetts-mess-7-18-11/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 04:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Investor&#39;s Business Daily</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IBD Editorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mitt romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[promises]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[universal coverage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">7CE1BA8B-33A0-492F-A410-2A0BAC38D665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Failure: ObamaCare is supposed to increase health coverage and slow spending. The promises of RomneyCare in Massachusetts were the same. But it has neither brought universal coverage nor contained costs.
The failure of former Gov. Mitt Romney&#8217;s health care reform&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Failure: ObamaCare is supposed to increase health coverage and slow spending. The promises of RomneyCare in Massachusetts were the same. But it has neither brought universal coverage nor contained costs.</p>
<p>The failure of former Gov. Mitt Romney&#8217;s health care reform to provide universal coverage in Massachusetts is well-documented. As many as 100,000 in the state remain without a health plan.</p>
<p>Less well documented, however, are the aggregate costs of health care reform in the Bay State since RomneyCare took effect in 2006. But that doesn&#8217;t mean there are no new costs associated with the law.</p>
<p>by OutloudOpinion.com For more Podcasts visit www.outloudopinion.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2011/07/19/massachusetts-mess-7-18-11/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://media.blubrry.com/ibdeditorials/traffic.libsyn.com/ibdeditorials/578707.mp3" length="2763326" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>health care reform,health coverage,health plan,mitt romney,promises,universal coverage</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:subtitle>Failure: ObamaCare is supposed to increase health coverage and slow spending. The promises of RomneyCare in Massachusetts were the same. But it has neither brought universal coverage nor contained costs.  The failure of former Gov.</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Failure: ObamaCare is supposed to increase health coverage and slow spending. The promises of RomneyCare in Massachusetts were the same. But it has neither brought universal coverage nor contained costs.

The failure of former Gov. Mitt Romney&#039;s health care reform to provide universal coverage in Massachusetts is well-documented. As many as 100,000 in the state remain without a health plan.

Less well documented, however, are the aggregate costs of health care reform in the Bay State since RomneyCare took effect in 2006. But that doesn&#039;t mean there are no new costs associated with the law.

by OutloudOpinion.com For more Podcasts visit www.outloudopinion.com</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Investor&#039;s Business Daily</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

