<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
>

<channel>
	<title>OutloudOpinion &#187; GOP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outloudopinion.com/tag/gop/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outloudopinion.com</link>
	<description>Podcasts for Thinkers.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 09:24:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<!-- podcast_generator="Blubrry PowerPress/1.0.8" mode="advanced" entry="simple" -->
	<itunes:summary>Podcasts for Thinkers.</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:author>OutloudOpinion</itunes:author>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://www.outloudopinion.com/wp-content/plugins/powerpress/itunes_default.jpg" />
	<itunes:owner>
		<itunes:name>OutloudOpinion</itunes:name>
		<itunes:email>webmaster@outloudopinion.com</itunes:email>
	</itunes:owner>
	<managingEditor>webmaster@outloudopinion.com (OutloudOpinion)</managingEditor>
	<itunes:subtitle>Podcasts for Thinkers.</itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:keywords>Conservative podcast, Immigration, Foreign Affairs, Iran, Israel, Iraq, Environmentalism, Global Warming, Global Warming Hoax, conservative, republican</itunes:keywords>
	
	<itunes:category text="News &amp; Politics" />
		<item>
		<title>Let&#8217;s Honor, Not Stretch, the Buckley Rule   1.30.12</title>
		<link>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2012/01/30/lets-honor-not-stretch-the-buckley-rule-1-30-12/</link>
		<comments>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2012/01/30/lets-honor-not-stretch-the-buckley-rule-1-30-12/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 03:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Limbaugh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Best of the Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative friends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[excitability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intense heat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lifetimes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presidential election]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">0B9627CD-A3CC-4D49-B469-35366F0BA98A</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the intense heat of the present, it is easy to forget even the relatively recent past, but it seems to me that this GOP primary season is more acrimonious than the past few, probably because the stakes are so&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the intense heat of the present, it is easy to forget even the relatively recent past, but it seems to me that this GOP primary season is more acrimonious than the past few, probably because the stakes are so high.<br />
       When I&#8217;ve noted that this is the most important presidential election of our lifetimes, a few excitability-resistant conservative friends have said, &#8220;They have been saying that about every election for more than a generation.&#8221; My response to that is:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2012/01/30/lets-honor-not-stretch-the-buckley-rule-1-30-12/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://media.blubrry.com/outloudopinion/traffic.libsyn.com/outloudopinion/20120130Limbaugh.mp3" length="2763326" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>conservative friends,excitability,GOP,intense heat,lifetimes,presidential election</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:subtitle>In the intense heat of the present, it is easy to forget even the relatively recent past, but it seems to me that this GOP primary season is more acrimonious than the past few, probably because the stakes are so high.</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>In the intense heat of the present, it is easy to forget even the relatively recent past, but it seems to me that this GOP primary season is more acrimonious than the past few, probably because the stakes are so high.
       When I&#039;ve noted that this is the most important presidential election of our lifetimes, a few excitability-resistant conservative friends have said, &quot;They have been saying that about every election for more than a generation.&quot; My response to that is:</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>David Limbaugh</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP, What’s Your Hurry? Obama wants Republicans to give him an opponent as quickly as possible.  1.10.12</title>
		<link>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2012/01/10/gop-what%e2%80%99s-your-hurry-obama-wants-republicans-to-give-him-an-opponent-as-quickly-as-possible-1-10-12/</link>
		<comments>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2012/01/10/gop-what%e2%80%99s-your-hurry-obama-wants-republicans-to-give-him-an-opponent-as-quickly-as-possible-1-10-12/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 15:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jordan Gehrke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[National Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dead man walking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hard time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republican opponent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">26FD8751-CE54-4E41-8322-4240677D15A3</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Republicans do not need to nominate a candidate anytime soon. On the contrary, if they want to beat President Obama, they should take their time before settling on a nominee.
In January of 2010, Harry Reid looked like a “dead&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republicans do not need to nominate a candidate anytime soon. On the contrary, if they want to beat President Obama, they should take their time before settling on a nominee.</p>
<p>In January of 2010, Harry Reid looked like a “dead man walking” politically. Fourteen percent of Nevadans were unemployed, and he was having a hard time getting above 43 percent in most polls. There was only one way he could win: destroy his Republican opponent before he or she ever got out of the blocks.</p>
<p>Brought to you by OutloudOpinion.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2012/01/10/gop-what%e2%80%99s-your-hurry-obama-wants-republicans-to-give-him-an-opponent-as-quickly-as-possible-1-10-12/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://traffic.libsyn.com/nro/20120110Gehrke.mp3" length="3151313" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>dead man walking,GOP,hard time,Harry Reid,republican opponent,republicans</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:subtitle>Republicans do not need to nominate a candidate anytime soon. On the contrary, if they want to beat President Obama, they should take their time before settling on a nominee.  In January of 2010, Harry Reid looked like a “dead man walking” politically.</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Republicans do not need to nominate a candidate anytime soon. On the contrary, if they want to beat President Obama, they should take their time before settling on a nominee.

In January of 2010, Harry Reid looked like a “dead man walking” politically. Fourteen percent of Nevadans were unemployed, and he was having a hard time getting above 43 percent in most polls. There was only one way he could win: destroy his Republican opponent before he or she ever got out of the blocks.


Brought to you by OutloudOpinion.com</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Jordan Gehrke</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>10 Questions To Find Our Next President (Part 2)   1.9.12</title>
		<link>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2012/01/09/10-questions-to-find-our-next-president-part-2-1-9-12/</link>
		<comments>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2012/01/09/10-questions-to-find-our-next-president-part-2-1-9-12/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 03:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Norris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Best of the Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barack obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presidential election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vote]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">6D34E0C3-5D40-44EB-B828-98F00779F60F</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whom should we nominate to represent the GOP in a fight against President Barack Obama in the 2012 presidential election?<br />
       I believe the name of the candidate that fills the majority of the answers in 10 particular questions deserves your vote.<br />
       Last&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whom should we nominate to represent the GOP in a fight against President Barack Obama in the 2012 presidential election?<br />
       I believe the name of the candidate that fills the majority of the answers in 10 particular questions deserves your vote.<br />
       Last week, I discussed the first five questions. (If you haven&#8217;t read those, please do so before proceeding.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2012/01/09/10-questions-to-find-our-next-president-part-2-1-9-12/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://media.blubrry.com/outloudopinion/traffic.libsyn.com/outloudopinion/20120109Norris.mp3" length="2763326" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>barack obama,GOP,presidential election,vote</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:subtitle>Whom should we nominate to represent the GOP in a fight against President Barack Obama in the 2012 presidential election?        I believe the name of the candidate that fills the majority of the answers in 10 particular questions deserves your vote.</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Whom should we nominate to represent the GOP in a fight against President Barack Obama in the 2012 presidential election?
       I believe the name of the candidate that fills the majority of the answers in 10 particular questions deserves your vote.
       Last week, I discussed the first five questions. (If you haven&#039;t read those, please do so before proceeding.)</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Chuck Norris</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Palin: 5 Reasons She Will Remain Relevant  10.06.11</title>
		<link>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2011/10/07/palin-5-reasons-she-will-remain-relevant-10-06-11/</link>
		<comments>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2011/10/07/palin-5-reasons-she-will-remain-relevant-10-06-11/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 04:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Investor&#39;s Business Daily</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IBD Editorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gop nomination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mark levin show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prayer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president of the united states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">522391D8-5117-4B5C-99CC-A15404D702A2</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Politics: Sarah Palin&#8217;s decision not to run for president left many of her supporters dispirited. We&#8217;re more sanguine. Fact is, there are more than enough reasons why Palin will continue to lead and to matter.
Speaking on The Mark Levin&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Politics: Sarah Palin&#8217;s decision not to run for president left many of her supporters dispirited. We&#8217;re more sanguine. Fact is, there are more than enough reasons why Palin will continue to lead and to matter.</p>
<p>Speaking on The Mark Levin Show Wednesday, Palin startled many by declaring: &#8220;After much prayer and serious consideration, I have decided that I will not be seeking the 2012 GOP nomination for President of the United States.&#8221;</p>
<p>Her statement read: &#8220;As always, my family comes first and obviously Todd and I put great consideration into family life before making this decision.&#8221;</p>
<p>by OutloudOpinion.com For more Podcasts visit www.outloudopinion.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2011/10/07/palin-5-reasons-she-will-remain-relevant-10-06-11/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://media.blubrry.com/ibdeditorials/traffic.libsyn.com/ibdeditorials/587343.mp3" length="2763326" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>GOP,gop nomination,mark levin show,prayer,president of the united states,Sarah Palin</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:subtitle>Politics: Sarah Palin&#039;s decision not to run for president left many of her supporters dispirited. We&#039;re more sanguine. Fact is, there are more than enough reasons why Palin will continue to lead and to matter.  Speaking on The Mark Levin Show Wednesday,</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Politics: Sarah Palin&#039;s decision not to run for president left many of her supporters dispirited. We&#039;re more sanguine. Fact is, there are more than enough reasons why Palin will continue to lead and to matter.

Speaking on The Mark Levin Show Wednesday, Palin startled many by declaring: &quot;After much prayer and serious consideration, I have decided that I will not be seeking the 2012 GOP nomination for President of the United States.&quot;

Her statement read: &quot;As always, my family comes first and obviously Todd and I put great consideration into family life before making this decision.&quot;

by OutloudOpinion.com For more Podcasts visit www.outloudopinion.com</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Investor&#039;s Business Daily</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Believing The Big Lie   9.26.11</title>
		<link>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2011/09/26/believing-the-big-lie-9-26-11/</link>
		<comments>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2011/09/26/believing-the-big-lie-9-26-11/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 00:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Investor&#39;s Business Daily</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IBD Editorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big lie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[continuing resolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal shutdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gop congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shutdowns]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">F8466A17-E7EA-4FF7-900B-DC4CA812A88E</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Misplaced Blame: The Democrats are setting up the Republicans to be the party responsible for a federal shutdown, should one occur. Of course the media will go along for the ride, just as in 1995 and 1996.
In the fall&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Misplaced Blame: The Democrats are setting up the Republicans to be the party responsible for a federal shutdown, should one occur. Of course the media will go along for the ride, just as in 1995 and 1996.</p>
<p>In the fall of 1995, the GOP Congress passed a continuing resolution spending bill to keep the federal government open. Bill Clinton vetoed it.</p>
<p>Polls, in some cases more than 2-1, showed the public blamed the subsequent shutdowns — one in November 1995, the other from Dec. 16, 1995 to Jan. 6, 1996 — on the Republicans. The fact that the public believed as it did is nearly inexplicable, since it was the GOP that passed the spending bill and a Democrat who vetoed it.</p>
<p>by OutloudOpinion.com For more Podcasts visit www.outloudopinion.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2011/09/26/believing-the-big-lie-9-26-11/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://media.blubrry.com/ibdeditorials/traffic.libsyn.com/ibdeditorials/586070.mp3" length="2763326" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>big lie,continuing resolution,federal shutdown,GOP,gop congress,shutdowns</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:subtitle>Misplaced Blame: The Democrats are setting up the Republicans to be the party responsible for a federal shutdown, should one occur. Of course the media will go along for the ride, just as in 1995 and 1996.  In the fall of 1995,</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Misplaced Blame: The Democrats are setting up the Republicans to be the party responsible for a federal shutdown, should one occur. Of course the media will go along for the ride, just as in 1995 and 1996.

In the fall of 1995, the GOP Congress passed a continuing resolution spending bill to keep the federal government open. Bill Clinton vetoed it.

Polls, in some cases more than 2-1, showed the public blamed the subsequent shutdowns — one in November 1995, the other from Dec. 16, 1995 to Jan. 6, 1996 — on the Republicans. The fact that the public believed as it did is nearly inexplicable, since it was the GOP that passed the spending bill and a Democrat who vetoed it.

by OutloudOpinion.com For more Podcasts visit www.outloudopinion.com</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Investor&#039;s Business Daily</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Run, Ryan, Run:  The Wisconsin congressman should make a presidential bid.    8.5.11</title>
		<link>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2011/08/05/run-ryan-run-the-wisconsin-congressman-should-make-a-presidential-bid-8-5-11/</link>
		<comments>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2011/08/05/run-ryan-run-the-wisconsin-congressman-should-make-a-presidential-bid-8-5-11/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 17:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey Anderson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[National Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barack obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congressman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt ceiling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frontrunners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">D7D756DC-5323-405F-A986-85FBF0621FCF</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the past several weeks, America was gripped by the question of whether Congress and the president would raise the debt ceiling. That debate has made even clearer the importance of, and the answer to, another question: Who should challenge&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the past several weeks, America was gripped by the question of whether Congress and the president would raise the debt ceiling. That debate has made even clearer the importance of, and the answer to, another question: Who should challenge Barack Obama in 2012?</p>
<p>The debate has highlighted how little the expected Republican presidential field has to offer in the important battles taking place in Washington. The GOP frontrunners didn’t provide any real leadership or even cogent advice from afar. They appeared at best uninvolved and at worst unserious.</p>
<p>Brought to you by OutloudOpinion.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2011/08/05/run-ryan-run-the-wisconsin-congressman-should-make-a-presidential-bid-8-5-11/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://traffic.libsyn.com/nro/20110805Anderson.mp3" length="3151313" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>barack obama,Congress,Congressman,debt ceiling,frontrunners,GOP</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:subtitle>For the past several weeks, America was gripped by the question of whether Congress and the president would raise the debt ceiling. That debate has made even clearer the importance of, and the answer to, another question: Who should challenge Barack Ob...</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>For the past several weeks, America was gripped by the question of whether Congress and the president would raise the debt ceiling. That debate has made even clearer the importance of, and the answer to, another question: Who should challenge Barack Obama in 2012?

The debate has highlighted how little the expected Republican presidential field has to offer in the important battles taking place in Washington. The GOP frontrunners didn’t provide any real leadership or even cogent advice from afar. They appeared at best uninvolved and at worst unserious.

Brought to you by OutloudOpinion.com</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Jeffrey Anderson</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Editorial: Don&#8217;t Compromise With Bad Ideas    7.19.11</title>
		<link>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2011/07/20/editorial-dont-compromise-with-bad-ideas-7-19-11/</link>
		<comments>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2011/07/20/editorial-dont-compromise-with-bad-ideas-7-19-11/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 05:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Investor&#39;s Business Daily</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IBD Editorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aug 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compromise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ticks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">FA25BA33-2EAF-4721-8191-ECC9AE0D4562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Debt: With &#8220;debtageddon&#8221; just two weeks away, the Democrats&#8217; strategy is clear. Offer no concrete spending cuts, say no to all GOP ideas, and insist on higher taxes as part of any deal. Is that what&#8217;s meant by &#8220;compromise&#8221;?
As&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Debt: With &#8220;debtageddon&#8221; just two weeks away, the Democrats&#8217; strategy is clear. Offer no concrete spending cuts, say no to all GOP ideas, and insist on higher taxes as part of any deal. Is that what&#8217;s meant by &#8220;compromise&#8221;?</p>
<p>As the phony Aug. 2 deadline ticks down, the House was expected to pass the Republicans&#8217; &#8220;cut, cap and balance&#8221; plan Tuesday night and send it to the Senate for a possible vote.</p>
<p>That plan, it seems to us, has the greatest virtues of the three plans that have been put forward — all of them by Republicans, by the way.</p>
<p>by OutloudOpinion.com For more Podcasts visit www.outloudopinion.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2011/07/20/editorial-dont-compromise-with-bad-ideas-7-19-11/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://media.blubrry.com/ibdeditorials/traffic.libsyn.com/ibdeditorials/578850.mp3" length="2763326" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>aug 2,compromise,GOP,republicans,ticks,virtues</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:subtitle>Debt: With &quot;debtageddon&quot; just two weeks away, the Democrats&#039; strategy is clear. Offer no concrete spending cuts, say no to all GOP ideas, and insist on higher taxes as part of any deal. Is that what&#039;s meant by &quot;compromise&quot;?  As the phony Aug.</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Debt: With &quot;debtageddon&quot; just two weeks away, the Democrats&#039; strategy is clear. Offer no concrete spending cuts, say no to all GOP ideas, and insist on higher taxes as part of any deal. Is that what&#039;s meant by &quot;compromise&quot;?

As the phony Aug. 2 deadline ticks down, the House was expected to pass the Republicans&#039; &quot;cut, cap and balance&quot; plan Tuesday night and send it to the Senate for a possible vote.

That plan, it seems to us, has the greatest virtues of the three plans that have been put forward — all of them by Republicans, by the way.

by OutloudOpinion.com For more Podcasts visit www.outloudopinion.com</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Investor&#039;s Business Daily</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boehner Briefs GOP on Debt Talks    7.13.11</title>
		<link>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2011/07/13/boehner-briefs-gop-on-debt-talks-7-13-11/</link>
		<comments>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2011/07/13/boehner-briefs-gop-on-debt-talks-7-13-11/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 15:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Costa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[National Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bipartisan plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt ceiling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt limit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gop leaders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">EA866FBF-9135-4B05-9DA0-5A013F37EC86</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Boehner told his conference this morning that he’ll head over for another round of debt-ceiling talks at the White House, but he’s not happy about it. “Am I angry about it? I sure as hell am,” he said this&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Boehner told his conference this morning that he’ll head over for another round of debt-ceiling talks at the White House, but he’s not happy about it. “Am I angry about it? I sure as hell am,” he said this morning to members present in the closed-door meeting. “I believe we are missing a great opportunity . . . the agreement we talked about is no longer operative.”</p>
<p>For over an hour this morning, House Republicans discussed the ongoing debt-limit negotiations. Leaving the meeting, members were both exasperated and optimistic — frustrated with the lack of a bipartisan plan as the debt ceiling approaches, but pleased that GOP leaders are consulting with the entire conference.</p>
<p>Brought to you by OutloudOpinion.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2011/07/13/boehner-briefs-gop-on-debt-talks-7-13-11/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://traffic.libsyn.com/nro/20110713Costa.mp3" length="3151313" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>bipartisan plan,debt ceiling,debt limit,GOP,gop leaders,John Boehner</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:subtitle>John Boehner told his conference this morning that he’ll head over for another round of debt-ceiling talks at the White House, but he’s not happy about it. “Am I angry about it? I sure as hell am,” he said this morning to members present in the closed-...</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>John Boehner told his conference this morning that he’ll head over for another round of debt-ceiling talks at the White House, but he’s not happy about it. “Am I angry about it? I sure as hell am,” he said this morning to members present in the closed-door meeting. “I believe we are missing a great opportunity . . . the agreement we talked about is no longer operative.”

For over an hour this morning, House Republicans discussed the ongoing debt-limit negotiations. Leaving the meeting, members were both exasperated and optimistic — frustrated with the lack of a bipartisan plan as the debt ceiling approaches, but pleased that GOP leaders are consulting with the entire conference.


Brought to you by OutloudOpinion.com</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Robert Costa</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rolling Downhill Since Jan. 20, &#8216;09   7.1.11</title>
		<link>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2011/07/02/rolling-downhill-since-jan-20-09-7-1-11/</link>
		<comments>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2011/07/02/rolling-downhill-since-jan-20-09-7-1-11/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 06:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Investor&#39;s Business Daily</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IBD Editorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barack obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gop challengers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jimmy Carter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presidential election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">92541C1E-0C17-47D7-BDF6-E879D2CD064A</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Election &#8216;12: Nearly half of Americans think they&#8217;re worse off now than they were when Barack Obama was inaugurated. Will GOP challengers start giving him the treatment Ronald Reagan gave Jimmy Carter?
&#8216;Are you better off than you were four&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Election &#8216;12: Nearly half of Americans think they&#8217;re worse off now than they were when Barack Obama was inaugurated. Will GOP challengers start giving him the treatment Ronald Reagan gave Jimmy Carter?</p>
<p>&#8216;Are you better off than you were four years ago?&#8221; Reagan asked in his closing statement in the only debate of the 1980 presidential election.</p>
<p>&#8220;Is there more or less unemployment in the country than there was four years ago? Is America as respected throughout the world as it was? Do you feel that our security is as safe, that we&#8217;re as strong as we were four years ago?&#8221;</p>
<p>by OutloudOpinion.com For more Podcasts visit www.outloudopinion.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2011/07/02/rolling-downhill-since-jan-20-09-7-1-11/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://media.blubrry.com/ibdeditorials/traffic.libsyn.com/ibdeditorials/577125.mp3" length="2763326" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>barack obama,GOP,gop challengers,Jimmy Carter,presidential election,Ronald Reagan</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:subtitle>Election &#039;12: Nearly half of Americans think they&#039;re worse off now than they were when Barack Obama was inaugurated. Will GOP challengers start giving him the treatment Ronald Reagan gave Jimmy Carter?  &#039;Are you better off than you were four years ago?</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Election &#039;12: Nearly half of Americans think they&#039;re worse off now than they were when Barack Obama was inaugurated. Will GOP challengers start giving him the treatment Ronald Reagan gave Jimmy Carter?

&#039;Are you better off than you were four years ago?&quot; Reagan asked in his closing statement in the only debate of the 1980 presidential election.

&quot;Is there more or less unemployment in the country than there was four years ago? Is America as respected throughout the world as it was? Do you feel that our security is as safe, that we&#039;re as strong as we were four years ago?&quot;

by OutloudOpinion.com For more Podcasts visit www.outloudopinion.com</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Investor&#039;s Business Daily</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t Let Liberal Establishment Choose Our Candidates    5.23.11</title>
		<link>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2011/05/23/dont-let-liberal-establishment-choose-our-candidates-5-23-11/</link>
		<comments>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2011/05/23/dont-let-liberal-establishment-choose-our-candidates-5-23-11/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 03:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Limbaugh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Best of the Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gop candidates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberal establishment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberal media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mounds]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">74CA17AF-3360-4DE9-8537-89B5AC0E2067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conservatives are worried that an ideal Reagan conservative has yet to emerge and lead the 2012 GOP presidential field. But are we allowing the liberal media (and establishment Republicans) to manipulate the narrative to prevent such a result?<br />
	Obviously, the liberal&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conservatives are worried that an ideal Reagan conservative has yet to emerge and lead the 2012 GOP presidential field. But are we allowing the liberal media (and establishment Republicans) to manipulate the narrative to prevent such a result?<br />
	Obviously, the liberal media do not have the best interests of Reagan conservatives in mind when they do their &#8220;reporting.&#8221; So when they tell us certain GOP candidates are unelectable or electable, common sense would counsel us to take their advice with mounds of salt. But do we?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2011/05/23/dont-let-liberal-establishment-choose-our-candidates-5-23-11/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://media.blubrry.com/outloudopinion/traffic.libsyn.com/outloudopinion/20110523Limbaugh.mp3" length="2763326" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>conservatives,GOP,gop candidates,liberal establishment,liberal media,mounds</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:subtitle>Conservatives are worried that an ideal Reagan conservative has yet to emerge and lead the 2012 GOP presidential field. But are we allowing the liberal media (and establishment Republicans) to manipulate the narrative to prevent such a result?</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Conservatives are worried that an ideal Reagan conservative has yet to emerge and lead the 2012 GOP presidential field. But are we allowing the liberal media (and establishment Republicans) to manipulate the narrative to prevent such a result?
	Obviously, the liberal media do not have the best interests of Reagan conservatives in mind when they do their &quot;reporting.&quot; So when they tell us certain GOP candidates are unelectable or electable, common sense would counsel us to take their advice with mounds of salt. But do we?</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>David Limbaugh</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

