<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
>

<channel>
	<title>OutloudOpinion &#187; 31810</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outloudopinion.com/tag/31810/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outloudopinion.com</link>
	<description>Podcasts for Thinkers.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 13:16:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<!-- podcast_generator="Blubrry PowerPress/1.0.8" mode="advanced" entry="simple" -->
	<itunes:summary>Podcasts for Thinkers.</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:author>OutloudOpinion</itunes:author>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://www.outloudopinion.com/wp-content/plugins/powerpress/itunes_default.jpg" />
	<itunes:owner>
		<itunes:name>OutloudOpinion</itunes:name>
		<itunes:email>webmaster@outloudopinion.com</itunes:email>
	</itunes:owner>
	<managingEditor>webmaster@outloudopinion.com (OutloudOpinion)</managingEditor>
	<itunes:subtitle>Podcasts for Thinkers.</itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:keywords>Conservative podcast, Immigration, Foreign Affairs, Iran, Israel, Iraq, Environmentalism, Global Warming, Global Warming Hoax, conservative, republican</itunes:keywords>
	
	<itunes:category text="News &amp; Politics" />
		<item>
		<title>Buying Votes With Water   3.18.10</title>
		<link>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2010/03/18/buying-votes-with-water-3-18-10/</link>
		<comments>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2010/03/18/buying-votes-with-water-3-18-10/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 01:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Investor&#39;s Business Daily</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IBD Editorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[31810]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constituent service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[louisiana purchases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tiny fish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[votes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water spigots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[with]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">FD8DA41A-2CA7-45CC-A33E-06A668C22FF2</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Politics: The water spigots are back on, at least temporarily, in California&#8217;s Central Valley. Turned off to protect a tiny fish, they happen to be in the districts of two congressmen &#8220;undecided&#8221; on health care reform.
One could chalk it&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Politics: The water spigots are back on, at least temporarily, in California&#8217;s Central Valley. Turned off to protect a tiny fish, they happen to be in the districts of two congressmen &#8220;undecided&#8221; on health care reform.</p>
<p>One could chalk it up to good fortune or just good constituent service. But in the middle of a contentious health care debate marked by Cornhusker Kickbacks and Louisiana Purchases, we may be forgiven if we find an announcement by the Department of the Interior regarding California&#8217;s water supply a tad too coincidental.</p>
<p>Brought to you by GoToAssist.com/techpodcast</p>
<p>by OutloudOpinion.com For more Podcasts visit www.outloudopinion.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2010/03/18/buying-votes-with-water-3-18-10/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://media.blubrry.com/ibdeditorials/traffic.libsyn.com/ibdeditorials/527775.mp3" length="2970854" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>31810,buying,constituent service,health care debate,health care reform,louisiana purchases,tiny fish,votes,water,water spigots,with</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:subtitle>Politics: The water spigots are back on, at least temporarily, in California&#039;s Central Valley. Turned off to protect a tiny fish, they happen to be in the districts of two congressmen &quot;undecided&quot; on health care reform.</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Politics: The water spigots are back on, at least temporarily, in California&#039;s Central Valley. Turned off to protect a tiny fish, they happen to be in the districts of two congressmen &quot;undecided&quot; on health care reform.

One could chalk it up to good fortune or just good constituent service. But in the middle of a contentious health care debate marked by Cornhusker Kickbacks and Louisiana Purchases, we may be forgiven if we find an announcement by the Department of the Interior regarding California&#039;s water supply a tad too coincidental.

Brought to you by GoToAssist.com/techpodcast

by OutloudOpinion.com For more Podcasts visit www.outloudopinion.com</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Investor&#039;s Business Daily</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:duration>3:06</itunes:duration>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Cities Can Take Care of Businesses  3.18.10</title>
		<link>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2010/03/18/how-cities-can-take-care-of-businesses-3-18-10/</link>
		<comments>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2010/03/18/how-cities-can-take-care-of-businesses-3-18-10/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Randazzo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reason.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[31810]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[american cities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[businesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[can]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competitive world]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[how]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Republic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[of]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private sector growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulatory climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[syndicated columnists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[take]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">950BAB35-A206-47A9-9D15-DA3AF0CE5629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Internet and globalization have both made it possible to operate a business from virtually anywhere and still serve a wide range of customers. Most firms no longer need to be located in downtowns or large financial districts. This flexibility&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Internet and globalization have both made it possible to operate a business from virtually anywhere and still serve a wide range of customers. Most firms no longer need to be located in downtowns or large financial districts. This flexibility has made it easier than ever for businesses to leave cities that have an unfavorable tax and regulatory climate. American cities in decline are largely victims of their own failure to take a fresh look at how the economy continuously repositions itself in an information-driven, globally competitive world market, and respond with policies that encourage entrepreneurial investment, private sector growth, and local consumption of goods, services, and housing.</p>
<p>From OutloudOpinion &#8211; For Podcasts of IBDeditorials, The New Republic, and Over 30 Syndicated Columnists, go to www.outloudopinion.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2010/03/18/how-cities-can-take-care-of-businesses-3-18-10/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://media.blubrry.com/reason/traffic.libsyn.com/reason/how-cities-can-take-care-of-bu.mp3" length="7094858" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>31810,american cities,businesses,can,care,cities,competitive world,how,New Republic,of,private sector growth,regulatory climate</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:subtitle>The Internet and globalization have both made it possible to operate a business from virtually anywhere and still serve a wide range of customers. Most firms no longer need to be located in downtowns or large financial districts.</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>The Internet and globalization have both made it possible to operate a business from virtually anywhere and still serve a wide range of customers. Most firms no longer need to be located in downtowns or large financial districts. This flexibility has made it easier than ever for businesses to leave cities that have an unfavorable tax and regulatory climate. American cities in decline are largely victims of their own failure to take a fresh look at how the economy continuously repositions itself in an information-driven, globally competitive world market, and respond with policies that encourage entrepreneurial investment, private sector growth, and local consumption of goods, services, and housing.

From OutloudOpinion - For Podcasts of IBDeditorials, The New Republic, and Over 30 Syndicated Columnists, go to www.outloudopinion.com</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Anthony Randazzo</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:duration>7:23</itunes:duration>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Death of Fiscal Federalism It’s been a long time since economic policy was forged in the states.  3.18.10</title>
		<link>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2010/03/18/the-death-of-fiscal-federalism-it%e2%80%99s-been-a-long-time-since-economic-policy-was-forged-in-the-states-3-18-10/</link>
		<comments>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2010/03/18/the-death-of-fiscal-federalism-it%e2%80%99s-been-a-long-time-since-economic-policy-was-forged-in-the-states-3-18-10/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Veronique de Rugy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reason.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[31810]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[been]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[death]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiscal federalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forged]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[in]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[its]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Republic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[of]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Podcasts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[since]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stimulus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[syndicated columnists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[was]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">8B52032B-9875-4867-8FF5-48DE37EFA602</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last May the Obama administration forced South Carolina not just to take its share of federal stimulus funds, but to spend the money on new programs rather than paying down the state’s debt. I was horrified. Obama, I felt, had&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last May the Obama administration forced South Carolina not just to take its share of federal stimulus funds, but to spend the money on new programs rather than paying down the state’s debt. I was horrified. Obama, I felt, had killed fiscal federalism. Then I realized that fiscal federalism has been dead for a long time. </p>
<p>From OutloudOpinion &#8211; For Podcasts of IBDeditorials, The New Republic, and Over 30 Syndicated Columnists, go to www.outloudopinion.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2010/03/18/the-death-of-fiscal-federalism-it%e2%80%99s-been-a-long-time-since-economic-policy-was-forged-in-the-states-3-18-10/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://media.blubrry.com/reason/traffic.libsyn.com/reason/the-death-of-fiscal-federalism.mp3" length="6116833" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>31810,A,been,death,Economic,Federalism,Fiscal,fiscal federalism,forged,in,its,long</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:subtitle>Last May the Obama administration forced South Carolina not just to take its share of federal stimulus funds, but to spend the money on new programs rather than paying down the state’s debt. I was horrified. Obama, I felt, had killed fiscal federalism.</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Last May the Obama administration forced South Carolina not just to take its share of federal stimulus funds, but to spend the money on new programs rather than paying down the state’s debt. I was horrified. Obama, I felt, had killed fiscal federalism. Then I realized that fiscal federalism has been dead for a long time. 

From OutloudOpinion - For Podcasts of IBDeditorials, The New Republic, and Over 30 Syndicated Columnists, go to www.outloudopinion.com</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Veronique de Rugy</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:duration>6:22</itunes:duration>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lawyer Up Liz Cheney: Guilty ’til proven innocent.  3.18.10</title>
		<link>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2010/03/18/lawyer-up-liz-cheney-guilty-%e2%80%99til-proven-innocent-3-18-10/</link>
		<comments>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2010/03/18/lawyer-up-liz-cheney-guilty-%e2%80%99til-proven-innocent-3-18-10/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Chait</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The New Republic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[31810]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative organization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crux of the matter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doj]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fusillade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guilty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innocent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innocent question]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liz Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proven]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[til]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[up]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">1F269B3A-8C06-4525-B7B0-BAF79D1E766A</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier this month,the conservative organization Keep America Safe launched a p.r. fusillade against Department of Justice (DOJ) attorneys who represented Guantánamo detainees. “The crux of the matter,” says Liz Cheney, chair of the organization, “is the American people have a&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier this month,the conservative organization Keep America Safe launched a p.r. fusillade against Department of Justice (DOJ) attorneys who represented Guantánamo detainees. “The crux of the matter,” says Liz Cheney, chair of the organization, “is the American people have a right to know whether lawyers who used to represent and advocate on behalf of terrorists” are working at DOJ. They just want to know who the terrorist lawyers are. An innocent question, to be sure.<br />
by OutloudOpinion</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.outloudopinion.com/2010/03/18/lawyer-up-liz-cheney-guilty-%e2%80%99til-proven-innocent-3-18-10/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://media.blubrry.com/tnr/traffic.libsyn.com/tnr/lawyer-up.mp3" length="7300911" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>31810,Cheney,conservative organization,crux of the matter,doj,fusillade,guilty,innocent,innocent question,lawyer,liz,Liz Cheney</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:subtitle>Earlier this month,the conservative organization Keep America Safe launched a p.r. fusillade against Department of Justice (DOJ) attorneys who represented Guantánamo detainees. “The crux of the matter,” says Liz Cheney, chair of the organization,</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Earlier this month,the conservative organization Keep America Safe launched a p.r. fusillade against Department of Justice (DOJ) attorneys who represented Guantánamo detainees. “The crux of the matter,” says Liz Cheney, chair of the organization, “is the American people have a right to know whether lawyers who used to represent and advocate on behalf of terrorists” are working at DOJ. They just want to know who the terrorist lawyers are. An innocent question, to be sure.
by OutloudOpinion</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Jonathan Chait</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:duration>7:36</itunes:duration>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

